"Catherine, it's hard to grasp the carnage your book describes in Rwanda. Didn't both the Hutus and the Tutsis have some form of the Christian faith in their cultural heritage?"
"Yes, they did. It seems, though, that at some point, the Christian story came to shape people's experience less than their Hutu or Tutsi story did. When your tribe's story becomes more important than Jesus', your opponent stops being the-enemy-Jesus-tells-me-to-love and becomes the-thing-that-threatens-my-way-of-life. Then the killing begins.”
Catherine Claire Larson's answer in an exchange over her book As We Forgive gave me pause ... then a couple of days later I discovered that Time magazine has discovered Calvinism (I know not everybody at commongrounds is a self-described Calvinist, but many of us are, including me).
Evidently, "The New Calvinism" is No. 3 among the "ideas changing the world" -- and is muscling its way past other Christian voices largely by virtue of the bite of its austerely demanding God.
"Holy Misdirection, Batman!" I can't imagine a more seductive invitation to abandon the Christian story for a tribal narrative than to start assessing whether our tribe is high enough on the list of cultural influence.
Personally, I agree that the answer to the profound brokenness and temptation that so many grow up with now is neither better therapy nor more friends, but God. I also agree that when you try to define God in the Bible's terms, you find theologians of John Calvin's sort to be superior guides.
I also am quite certain (though the Time article doesn't discuss this matter) that the economic woes we find ourselves in is a direct function of the loss of the self-restraint their Calvinism taught our forbears (see my own blog "Paul on Civic Virtue ... and Your Credit Card Debt").
But staying under the sway of the big God who through his Son is narrating to the cosmos its one true story of creation, fall, incarnation, reclamation -- that is the point. Trying to gauge where we are on the chart of influence -- and whether it's, say, pungency or affability that is more likely to move us ahead of other tribal voices -- is off task.
Lest the killing begin, thanks, Time, but no thanks.
--------- ----------
Editor's Note: a friend emailed me with this link from the same magazine, Time, sixty years before. From February 24, 1947, "Calvinist Comeback"?
Calvinism was once virtually the American Faith. It came to New England
with the Puritans, to New York with the Dutch Reformed, to Pennsylvania
with the German Reformed. And wherever Scottish Presbyterians went in
the U.S., predestination, 90-minute sermons, and the "Shorter
Catechism" went with them.
But the faith of ascetic, heretic-burning John Calvin was stern, hard
and alien to a boisterous young country in a nature-taming age.
Calvinism insisted on 1) the total depravity of man, 2) a God who, for
His own good reasons, irrevocably divided all mankind into the Elect
and the Damned, 3) strict "blue laws."-
Is Calvinism's stern faith on its way back—as a reaction against the
emotional confusions of war, inflation and the atomic age? Sure of it,
Professor Clarence Bouma, of Michigan's Calvin Seminary, writes in the
current Journal of Religion:
". . . The once dominant and self-confident liberalism speaks a
different language today. Horton and Van Dusen, Tillich and Niebuhr,
Fosdick and Morrison—it scarcely makes a difference to whom you turn.
All speak in the same apologetic strain, even though a few try to cover
their retreat. . . .
"These liberals no longer speak of the perfectibility of man. . . .
Whereas we used to hear of the glory, the progress, and the greatness
of man, we now hear of his 'fate' and his 'predicament.'. . . What has
all this to do with a possible revival of Calvinism?
"First of all, this new temper is a vindication—whatever the intent
of the liberals—of the Pauline-Augustinian-Calvinistic view of human
nature. . . .
"The message of Calvinism to modern man is that he must repent from his
idolatry, which is his greatest and root sin. His idolatry, in that he
has made a God of himself and made a problem of the living God of the
Scriptures. . . .
"We have had enough religion, religious philosophy and religious
psychology. It is time we again found the living God and began to build
the theological temple. . . .
"Let theology be theology! We have made everything of it except just
that. Theology is the coherent, systematic study of God and divine
things. . . . Somehow modern theology will have to find the road back
to the God of the Scriptures, the God of whom Pascal in his spiritual
autobiography is reported to have exclaimed in the night of his
conversion: 'God! the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob! The God of
Jesus Christ! Not the God of the philosophers and the scholars!'':
*In Geneva under Calvin (1541-64), joking and absence from
sermons were crimes.
Recent Comments